The only thing that’s disagreeable about this article is the unnecessary part about deniers. You make these people up as a bogeyman. This article is a perfect example of why your weather prediction arguments go down like a lead balloon. “I’ve studied the weather and believe that an apocalypse is approaching, if you doubt me you are a filthy denier” is what I hear when I read you. It’s great that you have your new belief system but attacking folks that don’t hold your beliefs is just asshole religious authoritarianism.
In recent decades it also seems we’ve had less snow than I recall growing up in the 1970s. I would imagine this contributes to the drought conditions we’ve experienced in central Iowa in recent years. Thank you for continuing to provide us with climate information, Chris.
So when some nations ignore the facts , we should too?! That's a compelling argument. The regulations will ruin the economy? We face the ruin anyway when the tariffs take effect. I'll trust the science not being paid for by the fossil fuel industry.
In the section of the article you supplied a link to entitled "The Future Action?" second paragraph " If this was a business decision" what else is it?! the rules and regulations will cost too much!! "We would pull all the experts into one room and listen to both sides of the argument....then make a balanced decision" Except that never happens. The "liberal left" is routinely dismissed.
There have been advances in manufacturing that have been beneficial to the environment (smokestack emissions, wastewater discharge regulations). Manufacturing left the US because of higher labor costs. i have worked in various plants for the last 47 years and many things have changed in the worker safety regulations to improve workers lives. Why can't we see more advancements to improve the life of the world? IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE!
I believe you are the one being misled. I know I am wasting my time replying to you and you won't be swayed, but I'm just trolling the troll. You must realize anyone reading Mr. Gloninger's article isn't going to be swayed either.
Listening to what you have to say is like taking advice from your orthopedic doctor for your heart health. You don't have a background in the science, but you certainly like to play expert.
The only thing that’s disagreeable about this article is the unnecessary part about deniers. You make these people up as a bogeyman. This article is a perfect example of why your weather prediction arguments go down like a lead balloon. “I’ve studied the weather and believe that an apocalypse is approaching, if you doubt me you are a filthy denier” is what I hear when I read you. It’s great that you have your new belief system but attacking folks that don’t hold your beliefs is just asshole religious authoritarianism.
"... a rich tapestry of data ..." You should hide your AI a little better.
Thanks for the work you put into these reports Chris, I appreciate them. Thanks for being an "alarmist" maybe it will wake more people up!
In recent decades it also seems we’ve had less snow than I recall growing up in the 1970s. I would imagine this contributes to the drought conditions we’ve experienced in central Iowa in recent years. Thank you for continuing to provide us with climate information, Chris.
So when some nations ignore the facts , we should too?! That's a compelling argument. The regulations will ruin the economy? We face the ruin anyway when the tariffs take effect. I'll trust the science not being paid for by the fossil fuel industry.
In the section of the article you supplied a link to entitled "The Future Action?" second paragraph " If this was a business decision" what else is it?! the rules and regulations will cost too much!! "We would pull all the experts into one room and listen to both sides of the argument....then make a balanced decision" Except that never happens. The "liberal left" is routinely dismissed.
There have been advances in manufacturing that have been beneficial to the environment (smokestack emissions, wastewater discharge regulations). Manufacturing left the US because of higher labor costs. i have worked in various plants for the last 47 years and many things have changed in the worker safety regulations to improve workers lives. Why can't we see more advancements to improve the life of the world? IT'S TOO EXPENSIVE!
I believe you are the one being misled. I know I am wasting my time replying to you and you won't be swayed, but I'm just trolling the troll. You must realize anyone reading Mr. Gloninger's article isn't going to be swayed either.
Listening to what you have to say is like taking advice from your orthopedic doctor for your heart health. You don't have a background in the science, but you certainly like to play expert.